Showing posts with label Thoughts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thoughts. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 August 2013

Garry Kasparov on Chess and His Life



I have always been mystified by chess so I watched this informed and informative portrait of Garry Kasparov talking about chess and his life in the former Soviet Union. He is interviewed by Sir David Frost. 




Last June in Manchester, Garry Kasparov took on Alan Turing's  "Paper Machine" - the first chess computer program ever written - for the first time in public, and Garry true to form wins in 16 moves. 

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/grandmaster-garry-kasparov-takes-on-alan-690039


Saturday, 24 August 2013

Engaging Voices

While having a coffee in a small cafe in Cambridge, I came across a lovely thought provoking journal. I noticed from its webpage the following which I thought was worth showing in full and definitely food for thought. 


sample cover JMW

Why Wisdom?

"Fashionable intellectuals today treat all ideas as fads. Alas, it’s a zeitgeist that’s conducive not to responsible thinkers but rather provocateurs, who do little of substance to foster the kind of humanity they claim to profess. Sensationalising not explaining, bamboozling not enlightening, berating not inspiring: society’s moralising has been entrusted to the likes of radical postmodernists, religious fundamentalists and political extremists, all of whom fit and shape the virulent modern media, even as they critique it.
Yet beneath this entanglement of weeds, wisdom endures: civilisation’s forgotten monument. Inscribed on it are history’s most profound existential lessons – thoughtful, conscientious and deep, yet down-to-earth, concrete and practical. There are homely meditations on how to live a meaningful, happy and good life. There are simple teachings on how to get the best out of oneself and others; to create more of the things that make life worthwhile – such as beauty, love, labour, compassion, peace and learning. And there are insights into human nature and how it can be channelled into achieving all this.
Through contributions from academics and other professionals – responsible intellectuals alike – the Journal of Modern Wisdom seeks to cut through the faddish brambles; to recover, reassert and redevelop wiser ways of living. Because ideas matter. And wisdom is the most valuable thing people can reflect on – and in doing so, with hope, achieve"

http://www.modernwisdom.co.uk/



Monday, 19 August 2013

Sunday, 1 April 2012

Foundations of the London Underground

It's fascinating to think that Harry Beck in 1931 sat down at his desk at home and mapped all the stations on the London Underground. Apparently he felt that as the stations were underground the physical locations did not matter as passengers simply wished to know how to get from one place to another. He based his map on an electrical circuit with coloured lines drawn only horizontally, vertically or at 45 degrees. All this was something he did for others to make their lives easier and what a simple yet great idea it was; serving perhaps as a template for other underground,metro or subway maps. 



                              http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/2443.aspx

Monday, 29 August 2011

Father and Son

This is a video I recently found. Its message is so simple yet so powerful.




Wednesday, 3 August 2011

A Future Generation and "Fantastic Mr Fox"

On an apparently ordinary train journey back from the north of England yesterday, there was a young family sat in front of me; a mother with her little son I guess around 5 or 6 and her daughter who looked a year or so older. Nothing unusual there but there were no computer games and no mobile phones. In fact the little girl was reading a children's book by Roald Dahl and the son was playing word games with his mother. For most of the three and a half hour journey, the mother continued to encourage the children to read and to engage with language and with no electronic media. I thought these children could well be destined for real future careers. Perhaps it's worth mentioning too that the family were second or third generation South Asian and such a fine family too.  


Sunday, 23 January 2011

Laying Down One's Roots

Isn't it strange how feelings towards yourself and your environment change with age. I've been reflecting upon where I am recently. I think this has shown itself in a current interest in DIY or home improvement. Up until a few years ago I always had a rule that I would live within walking distance of a railway station, a supermarket and a bank. Feelings of wanderlust used to be very close to my heart. I expect that's why commuting never really bothered me; they were like daily journeys opening up mini adventures crossing town.  Now those things are becoming less important as I see my flat as a potential 'home' and after 10 years of living in the same city I'm finally beginning to settle in. Perhaps it's the unconscious wish to lay down one's roots and feather the nest ready for potential fatherhood. Alternatively it may be the onset of middle age although I haven't bought my Porsche or Harley Davidson as yet.  I just hope it's the former rather than the latter; only time, and hopefully a lady to share the rest of my life with, will tell I guess.

Thursday, 13 January 2011

Different Perspectives and Bicycle Repairs.

Isn't it strange how certain things like experiences or books read just seem to remain with you. It's almost as is if they become part of who we are. I say this because last night as I was repairing my trusty bicycle I was reminded of Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. According to the model, we have at least nine proficiencies or intelligence tendencies in given areas. Indeed in 'Frames of Mind' he asks "have you ever seen a ten year old perform an Aikido kata of 50-60 movements with crisp precision, smooth flow and not a single hesitation?" Later on he goes on to describe how Henry Moore "thinks of the sculpture, whatever its size, as if he were holding it completely enclosed in the hollow of his hand." The former Aikido practitioner is showing a kinaesthetic tendency or proficiency while the sculptor is showing a greater spatial intelligence. Yet would both be catered for in formal college examinations which as Howard Gardner argues have traditionally been biased towards those with greater strengths in logic and linguistics. Perhaps the student who sits at the back of the class so often labelled the 'bad student' has strengths in other intelligence areas as opposed to just those more suited to academic examinations.




Tuesday, 11 January 2011

On Conversation

A few days ago I went with a colleague for a coffee. After being away for the festive and new year period, I thought we could catch up. So I agreed to go as I try to value the friendship. Using the word try may raise an eyebrow as surely a friendship by its very nature is valued. Yet there we were sitting at the table in a coffee shop that perhaps is a little larger than a double wardrobe; he believes in supporting local businesses. Yet what does he do? He starts evesdropping on a conversation between two mathematicians sitting there exchanging cryptic comments about some obscure area of mathematical theory. I thought we were in a coffee shop just to relax and catch up with the news etc, yet I as opposed to we seemed to be in the midst of a university seminar. I say I because my colleague also became involved in this intellectual competition. I thought what am I doing here. To break the monotonous exchanges I ventured to ask them where they were from and low and behold one was Norwegian but had actually spent some several years in Canada. He mentioned Montreal a place I had once been to and I noticed a brief smile from  a young woman sitting behind me; a spark of humanity lit a brief moment in the midst of this cerebral darkness but its fleeting brilliance soon fled as the mathematicians once again returned to their symposium or exercises in self aggrandisement.

Saturday, 8 January 2011

Inspiration from walking

Helen Dunmore is a writer I discovered fairly recently; her latest novel was nominated for the Booker literary award. I was attracted by the fact that it had been nominated and also by the setting: St Petersburg in the 1950s. I tend to think that any novel, film or work of literature opens a window onto another culture or time and potentially depending upon the work and the engagement it can be a very illuminating experience. Having done more research on the author, I came across this thought provoking article that she once penned on walking and the writing process.    


Walking into the story
"Coleridge thought nothing of walking from Nether Stowey to Bristol; Virginia Woolf, for all her fragile elegance, would often walk the eight miles from Rodmell to Charleston to visit her sister; Keats tramped Scotland, and Emily and Anne Brontë made a holiday of walking from Haworth to Keighley and staying there overnight.

There they go, all of them heroic walkers by our timid twenty-first century standard: John Clare, James Boswell, Jane Austen, Dorothy Wordsworth, Henry Mayhew, T S Eliot haunting the brown London fogs, Katherine Mansfield discovering the New Zealand backblocks, D H Lawrence on the coast path from Zennor to St Ives. They are on foot, observant, seeing, smelling, touching, hearing, getting blown about and rained on, sinking onto milestones or sheltering in the lee of thorn-hedges, carrying stout sticks, losing their way and finding it again, meeting leech-gatherers, bores, beggars, prostitutes, drunks, thieves, flower-sellers, and writing about all of them.

What chance would they have had, from the inside of a Volkswagen Golf? Driving doesn’t just get you from place to place rapidly. It provides you with a mobile private space, which you can control even when you are stuck in a traffic jam. You listen to your own music, choose your own climate, and need speak to no-one. You are outside, but inside, moving from place to place yet never in public. In a car you’ll never smell the warm, metallic wind that gusts down a tube platform, be thrown forward as you negotiate the aisle of a badly driven bus, give up your seat or have one given up for you, be asked for money in a dozen languages, negotiate a street full of chuggers, steer clear of drunken football supporters, smile at somebody else’s baby, overhear the broken bits of conversations, watch the dexterous flicker of a blind man’s stick, hear the creak of the school crossing-lady’s slicker as she lifts her lollipop, or smell the pungency of the first drops of rain hitting summer pavements. In your car you won’t be greeted, smiled at, shouted at, cursed. Or if you are, you won’t have to deal with it, except by driving away fast. You won’t get caught by the weather, and your legs won’t ache. Above all, you will never share the neutrality and anonymity of the streets.

Maybe, for many, those are fine reasons for taking out a bank loan fast, and buying that car. Muggers and drug dealers come to outweigh the exhilaration of walking late, brilliant streets, and who wants to be bothered with picking their way over fast-food litter? We may still go for walks, in landscapes of our own choosing, but we prefer them to be beautiful. And so as we grow older we grow safer, until we shame ourselves by not knowing the fare to anywhere, and having no shoes in which we can walk more than a few hundred yards.

Besides, there’s the dimension of status to be considered. Success steps out of its black Mercedes and walks into its intimate venue. Mediocrity plods.

But writing hasn’t changed: it’s still the stuff that you do when you are not at your desk. Maybe it’s because the first things I wrote were poems - and very likely the last things will be poems too - that I’m convinced work has to grow into its own rhythm, inside the head. And there’s no place better for composition than a road. It has everything: space, time, an inner solitude which is constantly interrupted by everything from the scent of lavender rubbed against the fingers to a stretch of police tape where a murder’s been committed. Such qualified, interrupted solitude may be better for a writer than conditions which are more obviously ideal.

And nothing more quickly calms the stretched, exposed mind after a day’s writing than to walk. Walking dissolves tension, anger, disappointment, anxious self-regard. What seems important at the beginning of an hour’s walk is not the same as what seems important at its end. So much has happened. After walking past a house a dozen times, you notice that high up on the wall there’s a plaque that says that Amy Valence and Katherine Louise Medlicott lived there from 1822 to 1869, ‘devotedly serving the poor of this parish’. Or there’s a sudden, sharp quarrel between two men outside a sandwich shop which uses ‘only halal meat’. And then, after a couple of miles, the reward of a Cadbury’s Flake - and all at once the characters who were sullenly frozen begin to move inside your head, or a piece of dialogue picks up speed.

Recently some well-known writers, including A S Byatt and Minette Walters, allowed a documentary film-maker to follow their writing process from the beginning of a book to its end. Maybe the idea behind the programmes was that television might capture that invisible moment when dithering disguised as preparation becomes the thing itself: creation, the slippages of the brain as it accelerates into words that go down as fresh and wet as paint. And once that creative moment is recorded, maybe it can be pinned down, analysed, imitated.

Many of us, it seems, whether we’re writers or not, like to know how the process works. At readings, the most frequently asked questions are those about a writer’s procedure. Hours of work, discipline or lack of it, how many words per day, how many drafts per manuscript, how many years make a novel and how many novels make a professional. Absinthe or Ovaltine, Mac or PC, sitting or standing, Google or British Library, caf or decaf, fags or nicotine patches .....

But the moment of composition may have nothing to do with sitting in front of a screen, or putting words on paper. It’s a moment that does not want to be recorded, except by the one person who can find a form for it. And as the camera approaches, the moment, like the writer, retreats and walks away, becoming the shape of Coleridge with his coat on, striding across the Quantocks and into a poem."
(This article was first published in The Author)


Friday, 7 January 2011

Moments of Reflection

It's marvellous to have time away from work to relax and take stock. I've always found that reading poetry helps to retrieve those increasingly distant memories so they can become once again those gently breathing embers warming the glow of the mental hearth. These are two I've recently encountered.   

Composed Upon Westminster Bridge.

Earth has not anything to show more fair:
Dull would he be of soul who could pass by
A sight so touching in its majesty:
This City now doth like a garment wear
The beauty of the morning; silent , bare,
Ships, towers, domes, theatres, and temples lie
Open unto the fields, and to the sky,
All bright and glittering in the smokeless air.
Never did the sun more beautifully steep
In his first splendour, valley, rock, or hill;
Ne'er saw I, never felt a calm so deep!
The river glideth at his own sweet will:
Dear God! the very houses seem asleep;
And all that mighty heart is lying still!


...William Wordsworth 3 Sept, 1802


 

The Road Not Taken

 

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveller, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I--
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference

...Robert Frost




http://www.chrischalkart.com/welsh_landscape_paintings.htm

Thursday, 6 January 2011

The limits of language and a blue guitar.

It's strange how certain thoughts constantly reoccur in your mind. I say this because since last night I've been quietly mulling over something I read on the act of reading itself. In fact it reminds me of Wittgenstein's idea of "the limits of my language are the limits of my world." The writer Robert Rowland Smith argues that "the book you're reading can't release any meaning without your mind to coax it out, the book suffers the same limits you do-it can mean only as much as your mind is capable of letting it mean." ('Breakfast with Socrates') In other words the "verbal aquarium of characters, colours and currents" can only become so in the mind. Yet there could also be another interpretation here and one that sends me back to the dictionary for the daily digest; that is to say the life of the text is bound or determined by our internal or mental dictionaries. I'm no fan of Arthur Scargill but he once said that his father would read the dictionary every day: "he says your life depends on your power to master words."  So it's back to the dictionary then after some lunch of course.

The man bent over his guitar,
A shearsman of sorts. The day was green.

They said, "You have a blue guitar,
You do not play things as they are."

The man replied, "Things as they are
Are changed upon the blue guitar."
('The Man With the Blue Guitar' Wallace Stevens)


Tuesday, 4 January 2011

New Year's Resolutions

I was always taught that at the beginning of each new year, it was tradition to make three new year's resolutions. Now from experience, come February and whoops what's happened to the resolutions, the new start, the new you... well perhaps not going that far. Chances are that if you have already been doing the activity such as going to the gym, then it becomes much easier to see the resolution through to the end of the year. So here goes for 2011 and the big three:
1. to read at least one book a month (with work and research commitments this could be a challenge)
2. to practise more art (much easier to do a drawing or painting a week)
3. to go to the gym at least 3 times a week (perhaps the easiest of all as I usually do anyway)

Tips from a psychologist to  keep those new year's resolutions:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12068595


Friday, 31 December 2010

Cleverness and Wisdom

Isn't it such a good feeling when someone who you really cherish buys you a special gift. It was a fascinating book or a series of essays incorporating philosophy, psychology, literature and so much more. In fact I came across this earlier on when the writer explores the differences between cleverness and wisdom. He points out that "where cleverness satisfies itself with winning arguments in the abstract, wisdom is a practical art, aimed at making deft judgements in the midst of everyday complications." I'm reminded of what a former colleague once said to me that anybody can be 'clever, clever' just paraphrasing or quoting writers, but what really changes society is having the wisdom, decency and goodness in knowing how to act in given situations or when faced with "everyday complications."



Perhaps on a similar note and again worth quoting are the famous words from Socrates who felt that "the unexamined life was not worth living and preferring dialogue to speeches, he'd get you to reflect on yourself and your actions in a way that would either lend them greater meaning or inspire you to make changes, and so create the meaning your life lacked." I think this is so true to ensure that each day can have fulfillling experiences.


The Good Samaritan

I was so pleased on arriving home on Christmas Eve. After a long and fatiguing journey back on the train, I thought that my mobile phone had been stolen; there I was at Piccadilly Station in Manchester rummaging through all my pockets and with five layers on, I was sweating away. I even traced my path back along the platform just hoping that there it would be just before my eyes, my treasured mobile phone. Unfortunately it was not to be and I resigned myself to being a victim of crime until I arrived home when I was confronted with the great news that a good samaritan had picked it up and handed it in to the lost property office; I was so relieved, so here's celebrating the good samaritan and the festive spirit.

Friday, 24 December 2010

Christmas Wishes

Christmas wishes to all and let's try and make the good spirit last all year; wouldn't the world be a much better place then. I've just found this article in the online Guardian newspaper by one of my favourite writers/essayists/philosphers: AC Grayling at Cambridge University.  

Peace and goodwill to all

Taking the season's greetings and applying them on a full-time basis might just make the world a better place.

If the expression "ordinary person" applied to anyone - and assuredly, except in the most reductive of statistical senses, it does not: the rule everywhere is individuality, and wonderfully so - you could get few gamblers to bet against a world-wide poll showing a massive majority in favour of the following (very meaningful) abstractions: peace, stability, justice. Why, then, is there so little of any of these things in so many parts of the world?
The question is only partly rhetorical. The part that is rhetorical recognises that there are many reasons why these abstractions remain so, and alas a lot of them are not just down to the activities of competing state-or-economy-controlling power elites (though they are the ones with the money and the biggest guns, and therefore are the major cause), but from lack of knowledge about other people and other ways, and the resulting possibilities for suspicion, fear and hostility on the part of enough "ordinary people" who otherwise wish that those abstractions would become concrete.
It's a mess: it means that in regard to what most of us most want, we are ourselves parties to ensuring we are least likely to get it.
Lip service is paid to these abstractions at this time of year, in parts of the world where a seasonal reminder occurs that they are meant to be our best goals. Of course it is a good thing that for a couple of weeks people send one another cards and greet one another in the street with professions of hope that goodwill and peace on earth will reign, whatever the basis of the hope: which for a humanist consists in taking very seriously indeed the obvious fact of the difference in people's lives between suffering and joy, deprivation and opportunity, captive minds and open hearts; conjoined with a profound desire to see everyone everywhere liberated into the rich possibilities that being human can bring. But how much better still if we sent each other cards and said these things all year round.
The task is an essential combination of the political and (take the word in a strictly secular sense to denote the fulfilment of the needs, aspirations and potentialities of heart and mind) spiritual. While there is poverty and conflict, millions are condemned to the loss of possibility that, as a result, makes "village Hampdens and mute inglorious Miltons" of them. What chiefly stands in their way is the fact that they are regarded as nothing but instruments (and at other times as obstacles) to the wealth and power of the few. The fact that things have ever been thus is no excuse, although surprisingly this is a premise of all conservatisms; there are precious few institutions of any kind which are not, just in virtue of being institutions, conservative in some way or degree.
Immanuel Kant argued that the arena of moral endeavour should be regarded as a "kingdom of ends". That everyone should always be treated as an end in himself or herself, never as a means to anything else. Think what it would mean if everyone actually thought this way. And this, incidentally, is the least of it: I would include all animals in this domain, as "moral patients" although they are not moral agents - that is, as worthy of moral regard. But the immediate task is to prevent people being too often and too reflexively thought of in the mass, individually indistinguishable, as numbers and statistics, treated as units for employment in industry or war, or for marketing purposes, or as percentages of votes.
When thinking about future housing and infrastructure, and estimating demographic effects on school and hospital provision, planners have to think in the lump, of course; just as they must when organising aid for refugees. But good planning gets down to particularities sooner rather than later. When the result includes such details as (say) toilets that have twice as many water closets in the ladies' as in the gents' you get the approving feeling that someone succeeded in planning for real people at last.
"Real people" rather than "ordinary people": that among other things is what a sense of the individuality of individuals means, and it should at very least give anyone pause who thought about the consequences of big political and economic decisions, like going to war or failing to control industrial pollution. In particular, it is where thoughts of the near-universal desiderata of peace, stability and justice typically obtrude, because they are essential parts of the framework that help to make individual good lives possible.
That suggests the other aspect to be addressed: the individual responsibility to stop thinking of others as bearers of singular identities differentiated only by generic characteristics: "Jew, black, this, that" - these are always a potential source of horrors. And people who think of themselves under the rubric of a singular identity ("I am an X") do themselves a disservice as well as those upon whom they place the distorting demand to treat them just in that one light. In an ideal world - the one where peace, stability and justice are the norm and their breakdown a terrible aberration - individual human beings would encounter one another first and foremost as exactly that: individual human beings, and whatever else they are (women, men, Christians, atheists, tennis players, Labour supporters, lovers of film, Stones fans, regular holidayers in Turkey, and so on for the many other things any one person could be) would be additional to that, and they would merit (or sometimes not) friendship and respect on the basis of their personal qualities, and only secondarily for some of their major choices about beliefs, politics and the rest. You might disagree with someone's views on a number of topics, but if he is kind, thoughtful and honourable that will trump much, which shows what really matters here.
In that ideal situation, seasonal hopes about goodwill and peace would be a lot less a matter of mere hope than they are now. But that is no reason for not continuing to hope. So I wish peace and goodwill to you all, and a happy new year.


                    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/dec/25/peaceandgoodwilltoall

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

Where has grammar been hiding all these years? | Macmillan

I came across this article earlier on. Whoops apparently according to the self appointed guardians of the English language, one should never end a sentence with a preposition nor split an infinitive despite the classic example from James Kirk. Perhaps we should all boldly go forward and study Michael Swan's 'Practical English Usage' or Martin Parrot's 'Grammar for English Language Teachers' to consider how the language is used today rather than how it should be used; usually this is based on an 18th century Latin model of grammar and what is the present year 2010, oh yes I almost forgot. Perhaps as David Crystal points out it's time to consider the variety of Englishes used by around 2 billion people throughout the world, the vast majority of whom are non native speakers as opposed to the models used by the 60 million speakers in the UK.
Click this link to access the article:



Monday, 20 December 2010

A Winter Landscape

There's been a lot of criticism towards the authorities lately in Old Blighty but I love the winter snow clad landscape; to go out for a stroll in the crisp chill air is so refreshing and healthy too, as long as you're wrapped up of course. So why try to fly halfway around the world chasing the heat of the sunshine? There's nothing like returning home to a cosy warm room, pleasant music and a good film or an interesting novel after a morning or afternoon stroll . So here are a few photos of the beautiful winter.  





Monday, 29 November 2010

The Business of Language

For all those interested in language I came across this on an English language teaching website. I think it's worth reprinting in full as I was quite surprised and pleased at Fiona's stance.  
A stiff letter to The Times - has the BBC gone mad?



"Dear BBC
I am a lover of radio 4 and am constantly energised, fascinated and enriched by its programmes. However, I feel moved to comment on the utter nonsense I was subjected to on The World Tonight, Tuesday 3rd August in the discussion on language and specifically “verbing” between Felicity Evans and her guest Rhea Williams, chairman of the Queen’s English Society.
The discussion centred on whether “verbing”, changing a noun to a verb, is acceptable, in response to President Obama’s comment that American troops would be “partnering” those from Afghanistan. Now this is a topic that delights the pedant (and therefore a certain percentage of the radio 4 audience) but produces nothing short of apoplectic rage in me. It is bad enough having to listen to yet another ill-informed discussion on language change and standardisation, but having to listen to non linguists bandy about their emotional reactions to something they just don’t like and clearly have no understanding of is both fury inducing and a waste of everyone’s time.
There are many linguists in the world such as the entire staff of the department of Educational and Professional Studies at King’s College London where I studied the MA English Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics or countless other academics who would have been able to provide an informed and reasoned discussion on this topic but no, someone at the BBC decided that the appropriate body to approach for an intelligent, well informed discussion would be The Queen’s English Society. Now, while I admit that some of their work is admirable, many of the comments in the discussion served as a reminder as to why I chose the words “utter nonsense” in my opening sentence.
Some examples on the topic of whether “verbing” is acceptable and I quote from the programme:
1.       Rhea Williams: ...it depends if they are ugly or not.
Felicity Evans: Yes, I’m with you on that. If it’s elegant one should be able to get away with it but the trouble with that is that it’s a question of personal taste.

Yes, is it – discussion should end here.

2.       RW: to grow a company, that’s actually just vile...What’s’ wrong with we’re trying to get the company to get bigger or we’re trying to make it better?
Indeed, but what’s wrong with to grow a company? Exactly, please. What... is... exactly... wrong?
3.       RW: My most favourite one is “This door is alarmed”.
Oh how droll you are – I too can hardly contain myself for laughing.
4.       RW: ... I think an awful lot of them are really horrid.
And I think you’re insane.
5.       FE: ... if you fail to properly communicate what you mean, the language has failed.
Or there has been a breakdown in communication between the speaker and listener which is likely to be clarified by the use of repairing strategies such as saying “What do you mean?”
6.       RW (in answer to FE’s previous insightful observation): Absolutely.
How?
7.       FE: Business jargon is the worst. I saw a press release about encouraging children to access oily fish. How do you access an oily fish?
Go to Sainsbury’s – they have loads of fish.
8.       RW: We often turn things into a verb for speed so you could say “Are you lemonading or wining?”
Mmm. At 9 syllables it is longer than “Do you want lemonade or wine?” which is 8 syllables. So the point about speed is what exactly?
9.       RW: But if you’re going to try to access a fish, that’s just bonkers.
FE: It is bonkers.
Not nearly as bonkers as you two.
I wonder whether you could get a real expert i.e. a linguist in to discuss language change and the factors which influence it, in the process debunking some of the myths surrounding the subject. I’d be happy to provide a list of names and contacts but in the meantime please remember the following:
All languages change
Change is not wrong, it is change
Communities and groups use specific language or jargon for many socio-cultural reasons – leave them alone
Most people use language in a range of social situations and change it to adapt the situation
Business is not corrupting English, it is doing business
There is no such thing as Standard English. "

Yours, 
Outraged, South London

For the entire discussion, go to:http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00t6trb/b00t6tqd/The_World_Tonight_03_08_2010/ and start listening from 25.50 minutes in.

An interesting read.


"How I Got Lost in Translation"

I've just finished reading this article on the importance of translation; it's from yesterday's Observer newspaper  and I think it's worth reprinting in full here. Let me know what you think, thanks. 

How I got lost in translation and found my true calling

Translation can be an underpaid, anonymous job. Yet it is crucial for the cross-fertilisation of literature and for Maureen Freely, it has become a deeply satisfying life's work.
The Observer,

Outside the Anglophone world, it is not unusual for novelists and poets to work at some point in their lives as translators. Though most will say that they did so mainly to subsidise their own writing, it is often clear, when you look at that writing, that it has been enriched by the imaginary conversations they've had with the poets and novelists whose words they have translated.
Istanbul: Memories and the City
by Orhan Pamuk

If there is such a thing as world literature, it is because today's most interesting writers are also well‑travelled readers and a lot of what they read is in translation. An up-and-coming Colombian novelist might be inspired not just by Borges, Conrad and Faulkner, but by contemporary novelists from Asia, Africa and Europe; his literary response to their work will go on to influence what his contemporaries on the other side of the world write next. These complex patterns of cross-fertilisation would end overnight if it were not for literary translators and the publishers who support them. So you'd think people would thank us, wouldn't you?
Well, sometimes they do, but in the next breath they'll tell you what a terrible career move you've made. To a degree, they're right, because the pay is pretty appalling. Although some translators get a sliver of the royalties, most work for a flat fee. We who translate from non-western languages will often discover, if a book becomes a world phenomenon, that most other translations will be from our translation and not the original. But by and large, we receive no extra fee and it is only when those working from our translations send us frantic emails that we discover how far our words have travelled.
World literature is the big new thing in literature departments, so you'd think our good name would be assured here at least. Sadly, universities and their regulators tend to be suspicious about translations, possibly because they don't know what yardstick to measure them by. For the last Research Assessment Exercise, I was asked to explain in precise terms how my translations had contributed to world knowledge. For the next one, I shall also have to demonstrate their economic impact.
You could say that all we're doing, really, is replicating someone else's thoughts. And aren't we soon to be replaced by machines? I don't think so. Here is the sublime first sentence of Orhan Pamuk's Istanbul: Memories of a City as rendered by Google Translate: "A place in the streets of Istanbul, similar to ours in a different house, with everything I like, twin, or even exactly the same, starting from childhood lived another Orhan a corner of my mind I believed for many years." And here is the first sentence of his seminal novel, The Black Book, replicating the Turkish word and suffix order as closely as possible: "Bed-of top-from tip-to as-far-as stretched-out blue checked quilt-of rugged terrain-its, shadowy valleys-its and blue soft hills-its-with covered sweet and warm darkness-in Rüya face-down stretched-out sleeping-was."
When I translate, I become something akin to a shadow novelist. When I am shadowing Pamuk, what I want to do most is capture the music of his language as I hear it. Accuracy is important, but a lot of what I need to be accurate about lies deep below the surface. After consultation with the author, the first sentence of The Black Book became: "Rüya was lying face down on the bed, lost to the sweet, warm darkness beneath the billowing folds of the blue-checked quilt." The first sentence of Istanbul was: "From a very young age, I suspected there was more to my world than I could see: somewhere in the streets of Istanbul, in a house resembling ours, there lived another Orhan so much like me that he could pass for my twin, even my double." I can see, even as I type these sentences, how ephemeral they are. Other translators will find their own ways to capture what they see and hear in the text.
I was initially drawn to this art because, after many years of journalism, I longed for a quiet life. I imagined weeks and months of solitary reflection in my favourite chair. And of course there were periods like this. But if you are translating a controversial author, the world is never far away.
My first rude awakening came while I was translating the first chapters of Pamuk's 2002 novel, Snow. A Turkish newspaper got in touch; having heard what I was up to, it wanted to know what I thought of the headscarf issue, about which Snow has a great deal to say. My innocuous answer (that a woman should be able to choose what she wears on her head) was transformed into a provocative headline ("I curse the fathers!"), following which I was bombarded with emails from an extremist Islamist newspaper. I could not help but notice that their questions were almost identical to those asked by an Islamist extremist in the chapter I'd just translated. It ends with said extremist pumping a few bullets into his interlocutor's head.
Over the years that followed, and especially during 2005 and 2006, when Orhan Pamuk and many other writer friends of mine were subjected to hate campaigns for speaking openly about the Armenian genocide, later to be prosecuted for insulting Turkishness, there were times when I felt as if I had wandered into the book I was translating.
There were also the lesser fictions in which I featured as a süperajan (no translation needed). Many Turks who feel ambivalent about Pamuk like to attribute his international success and most especially his Nobel prize to his translators, who have, they claim, "improved his words for western consumption". The ultranationalists who drove the hate campaign went so far as to say he had sold his country to Europe for the sake of his career.
If I were just a translator, I might not have thought it necessary to write in Orhan's defence in the media here and elsewhere. I might not have become involved in the campaigns for free expression that went on to change my life and will doubtless carry on doing so. But this seems to be the rule for translators and not the exception.
Most of us do a great deal off the page. More often than not, we are the ones who bring new authors to the attention of publishers. Some run programmes that bring together young writers from countries that were once at war. Some run programmes in schools, working with children who speak a language other than English at home. Many are also novelists, poets, journalists and teachers. Some – most commonly those who translate out of minority languages – are agents.
I know all this because there aren't very many of us. We all work for the dozen or so publishers which remain committed to fiction in translation even as the walls of fortress English grow and grow. If the art of literary translation continues to thrive in this country, it will be thanks to them, and also to the British Centre for Literary Translation, which is training the new generation, and the Translators Association, which speaks up for us when we're exploited, and the Independent foreign fiction prize, whose organisers work hard to take our best efforts to a larger audience.
Why do any of us bother, when the odds are so against us? Because it's fun to discover new books and new writers. It's gratifying to see at least some of them do well. For me, it makes a welcome change from my old life, when I mainly looked after number one, wasting acres of times fretting about bylines and book sales and column inches. Somehow, this feels more romantic and far more worthwhile.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/nov/28/maureen-freely-translation-orhan-pamuk